Entry Instance

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, PUT, PATCH, DELETE, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "id": 860401,
    "url": "https://info.mzalendo.com/api/v0.1/hansard/entries/860401/?format=api",
    "text_counter": 531,
    "type": "speech",
    "speaker_name": "Kipipiri, JP",
    "speaker_title": "Hon. Amos Kimunya",
    "speaker": {
        "id": 174,
        "legal_name": "Amos Muhinga Kimunya",
        "slug": "amos-kimunya"
    },
    "content": " Thank you, Hon. Temporary Deputy Chairman. When I look at the amendment by the Chair and the one by the Leader of the Majority Party, I am inclined to go with the amendment by the Chair because, we are dealing with high value produce and by limiting to only an inspector, we will have a situation where at some level, you may want to send the CEO himself to carry out that inspection. What we have here is not a number of people going to inspect, it is an enabling clause that says that the CEO could do a random inspection and you do not want to deny him that. Any appointed Council inspector could do it. The amendment further provides on how the Council shall appoint and gazette the inspectors. I would find this better rather than saying that an inspector will go and do it because you are denying the CEO, who may be called upon by Parliament to lead that inspection. He will say the law does not allow him, it only allows an inspector to do it, yet he is the one responsible for the oversight of these things. Let us give the CEO the mandate to actually do it. I agree with the Chair that this is the better formulation."
}