GET /api/v0.1/hansard/entries/872910/?format=api
HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, PUT, PATCH, DELETE, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "id": 872910,
    "url": "https://info.mzalendo.com/api/v0.1/hansard/entries/872910/?format=api",
    "text_counter": 523,
    "type": "speech",
    "speaker_name": "Sen. Sakaja",
    "speaker_title": "",
    "speaker": {
        "id": 13131,
        "legal_name": "Johnson Arthur Sakaja",
        "slug": "johnson-arthur-sakaja"
    },
    "content": "Article109(3) says a Bill not concerning county governments is considered only in the National Assembly and passed in accordance with Article 122 and Standing Orders of the Assembly. Article 109(4) says a Bill concerning county governments may originate in the National Assembly or Senate, and is passed in accordance with Articles 110 to 113, Articles 122 and 123 and the Standing Orders of the Houses. The question we are talking about is not a legal question that would need a ruling on the admissibility of this Bill as it is. It is actually a question of how we are positioning ourselves as a House, what we feel about the fact that this Bill was brought from the other side. I think there is wisdom in it being dealt with at the Second Reading even without putting it to a vote but let us finish the debate at the Second Reading and the SBC will determine the tactics around it. I have liked the proposal that both my Bill through these amendments and the other Bill with amendments continue being prosecuted. Even if they are the same in the Title, form and content, they are not the same."
}