GET /api/v0.1/hansard/entries/884200/?format=api
HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, PUT, PATCH, DELETE, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "id": 884200,
    "url": "https://info.mzalendo.com/api/v0.1/hansard/entries/884200/?format=api",
    "text_counter": 102,
    "type": "speech",
    "speaker_name": "Suba North, ODM",
    "speaker_title": "Hon. John Mbadi",
    "speaker": {
        "id": 376,
        "legal_name": "Millie Grace Akoth Odhiambo Mabona",
        "slug": "millie-odhiambo-mabona"
    },
    "content": " Thank you, Hon. Speaker for indulging me. As a follow up to what Hon. Junet has spoken about - I am not doubting the explanation that has been given by the Speaker - I am curious about how the two reports landed on the Speaker’s desk for approval. This sets a very bad and dangerous precedent because the Speaker’s Office can easily be given a wrong report to sign. Hon. Speaker, we do not expect you to have time to go through the pages and volumes of reports. It is expected that the work of scrutinizing is done elsewhere, but your approval should be ceremonial so to speak, as the Head of Parliament. My concern is that looking at those two reports, there is a material difference in one of the recommendations. In fact, the entire Report is the same, but one recommendation talks about reviewing the certificate of that doctor with a bid to regularise it. Then, the other one says, cancel. To me, this is so material that we need to get clear explanation how these two reports could land on the Speaker’s Desk, so that we rule out mischief. You are aware that there have been many"
}