GET /api/v0.1/hansard/entries/886190/?format=api
HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, PUT, PATCH, DELETE, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept
{
"id": 886190,
"url": "https://info.mzalendo.com/api/v0.1/hansard/entries/886190/?format=api",
"text_counter": 316,
"type": "speech",
"speaker_name": "Sen. (Dr.) Ali",
"speaker_title": "",
"speaker": null,
"content": "The CEC member will have to look into that so that the issue of sub-section (2) does not arise. As it has been said before, Clause 12(7) states that:- “All funds allocated to a ward shall be cumulative and shall be carried forward from one financial year to the next, including funds returned into the account or funds which are not utilised for whatever reasons” That one might not be significant. It might bring confusion because if the money allocated to counties, once it is not utilised, it stays with the same counties as well. Somebody mentioned that this one might not be necessary. I feel it is necessary because even within the same county, if you remove that one, then they can reallocate that money again. They can say that since it is not stated, that whatever remains in the wards should remain there, they can reallocate it to somewhere else within the constituency or some other parts of the county. It is important that Clause 12(7) stays the way it is."
}