Entry Instance

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, PUT, PATCH, DELETE, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "id": 888714,
    "url": "https://info.mzalendo.com/api/v0.1/hansard/entries/888714/?format=api",
    "text_counter": 1134,
    "type": "other",
    "speaker_name": "",
    "speaker_title": "",
    "speaker": null,
    "content": "the consultative forum. However, we do not agree on something. The Committee is of the view that the establishment of the County Planning Consultative Forum in each county is not necessary. We have the National Consultative Forum, but the Senate suggests we also have consultative forums at the county level. The Committee has a problem with that proposal. It is not necessary because the national forum is adequate in terms of dealing with policy issues. Their proposal will amount to duplication of the cabinet. The membership of the county forum entails CECs from different departments who sit together and that is equal to having a cabinet sitting meant to deliberate on land matters. Indeed, that is something that can be easily done by the CEC in charge of lands. This will create bureaucratic structures that will slow decision-making and make counties incur huge costs. Further, the Committee agrees with the Senate proposal to increase the representation of"
}