GET /api/v0.1/hansard/entries/91115/?format=api
HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, PUT, PATCH, DELETE, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept
{
"id": 91115,
"url": "https://info.mzalendo.com/api/v0.1/hansard/entries/91115/?format=api",
"text_counter": 85,
"type": "speech",
"speaker_name": "Mr. Wako",
"speaker_title": "The Attorney-General",
"speaker": {
"id": 208,
"legal_name": "Sylvester Wakoli Bifwoli",
"slug": "wakoli-bifwoli"
},
"content": "If you follow the HANSARD of that day, I had actually answered this Question. However, hon. Mututho and Dr. Khalwale then tabled other letters raising complaints against the SACCO, which were not in any way related to the Question which was before the House. The Question was with regard to the letter of 12th August, 2003. These other complaints were about December, 2009. That is why I protested that those were different Questions, which should follow the laid down procedure under Standing Order No.42. The then Chair kept on saying that I must look at them and make comments on those letters, but I protested and said that there must be a ruling on that issue. The HANSARD Report will bear me out. Then out of the blues, you said that the Question should be re- listed when I had already answered it. The issue was whether the other complaints which were being tabled should be answered or not. I objected because Standing Order No.42 had not been followed. Therefore, I crave your indulgence for you to look at the proceedings and instead of re-listing this Question you, at least, make some ruling on it. The matter can then be re-listed or not re-listed in accordance with the ruling that you may make on it. So, I kindly request you to review the decision to place this Question on Thursdayâs Order Paper and put it on a day that is convenient to you after you have read the HANSARD Report in order that you can come up with a ruling, if the HANSARD Report bears me out on the matter."
}