Entry Instance

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, PUT, PATCH, DELETE, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "id": 919194,
    "url": "https://info.mzalendo.com/api/v0.1/hansard/entries/919194/?format=api",
    "text_counter": 355,
    "type": "speech",
    "speaker_name": "Garissa Township, JP",
    "speaker_title": "Hon. Aden Duale",
    "speaker": {
        "id": 15,
        "legal_name": "Aden Bare Duale",
        "slug": "aden-duale"
    },
    "content": " Hon. Temporary Deputy Chairman, I need the Chairman of the Committee to make a number of clarifications. The Bill provides for the process of the removal of a Clerk to be similar to that of removing a commissioner. This is unacceptable. A Clerk is a staff of the Commission. So, how a commissioner is removed from office cannot be the same as removing a Clerk from office. So, I want the Chair to come clear on this. Maybe other Members can contribute. Clause 22 of the Bill says that the Clerk of a House of Parliament may be suspended or removed from the office of the Commission for “inability to perform the function of the office whether arising from infirmity of body or mind, gross misconduct or misbehaviour, incompetence, bankruptcy, violation of the Constitution”. In that case, a clerk will never be removed. I can tell you that you can as well call him a commissioner. It will be hard for the Commission to remove a Clerk from office. That is not how CEOs of other commissions are removed."
}