GET /api/v0.1/hansard/entries/928040/?format=api
HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, PUT, PATCH, DELETE, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "id": 928040,
    "url": "https://info.mzalendo.com/api/v0.1/hansard/entries/928040/?format=api",
    "text_counter": 197,
    "type": "speech",
    "speaker_name": "Nominated, JP",
    "speaker_title": "Hon. David ole Sankok",
    "speaker": {
        "id": 13169,
        "legal_name": "Jeniffer Shamala",
        "slug": "jeniffer-shamala"
    },
    "content": " We have ability beyond disability. By the way, my performance in school might have been better than yours, but your performance of running in the field would have been better than mine. So, you were disabled in the classroom and I was disabled in the field. I oppose this Bill. This is an electoral process which involves Members of Parliament, Senators, governors and Members of County Assemblies (MCAs). These are the people who will be put to test. Why should we bring independent commissions, which have not settled to know their proper duties? They are not aware of the electoral process and are not affected directly by the end result of the electoral process. The selection panel should be an oversight authority to the IEBC. It will not only be terminated after the selection of commissioners, but will be there in case commissioners resign like the ones who resigned. I believe with more consultation, the selection panel can become an oversight authority that will discipline the IEBC commissioners in case they mess up. Again, why should we have a representation of the EACC? For sure, what will they be doing in the selection panel? Already, the Bill has forgotten a whole constituency in the selection panel and even in the nominees to be The electronic version of the Official Hansard Report is for information purposes only. Acertified version of this Report can be obtained from the Hansard Editor."
}