Entry Instance

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, PUT, PATCH, DELETE, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "id": 933083,
    "url": "https://info.mzalendo.com/api/v0.1/hansard/entries/933083/?format=api",
    "text_counter": 303,
    "type": "speech",
    "speaker_name": "Endebess, JP",
    "speaker_title": "Hon. (Dr.) Robert Pukose",
    "speaker": {
        "id": 1458,
        "legal_name": "Robert Pukose",
        "slug": "robert-pukose"
    },
    "content": "“Mr. Noor in his testimony stated that he gave a copy of the letter to Hon. Fatuma Gedi late in the evening on Friday at around 4.00 p.m., but soon thereafter, he learnt that a copy of the letter he had given to Hon. Fatuma Gedi was being circulated on the social media.” It also goes on to say that even the memo was being circulated on the social media. To me, it is a question of how sensitive documents that concern all of us were handled. I am looking at the moral issue of how documents that concern Hon. Members are being guarded within the precincts of Parliament. If this Committee on Powers and Privileges is not supported in its Report, then it means we will be exposing the Members and anything that you have done, your file or even your medical report, can be shared on the social media. If you look at the submission of Hon. Fatuma Gedi, it says that she got the document from Noor. After getting the document from Noor, she went to the lounge where she left that the document. To me, it is a lame excuse. It is not the truth. It is careless handling of sensitive information which was concerning her. So, the Committee, sitting and saying that it is reprimanding the Member is a very fair position. It protects the integrity of the Member and it is very wrong for us to start diverting issues concerning the Member to discuss her. We should just discuss the handling of that document and we leave it at that level. With those few remarks, I support."
}