GET /api/v0.1/hansard/entries/939808/?format=api
HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, PUT, PATCH, DELETE, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept
{
"id": 939808,
"url": "https://info.mzalendo.com/api/v0.1/hansard/entries/939808/?format=api",
"text_counter": 206,
"type": "speech",
"speaker_name": "Kitui Central, WDM-K",
"speaker_title": "Hon. Makali Mulu",
"speaker": {
"id": 1955,
"legal_name": "Benson Makali Mulu",
"slug": "benson-makali-mulu"
},
"content": " Thank you, Hon. Temporary Deputy Chairlady. I am just trying to find out since Section 25 is part of the Bill and Clause 3 will automatically come before Section 25, whether there will be any harm if the wording of Section 25 would have possibly have been baseless other than making reference to it. That means you delete Clause 3 and then you have to move to Section 25. I am not a legal expert, but maybe drafting will not allow that. I am just finding out."
}