GET /api/v0.1/hansard/entries/940085/?format=api
HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, PUT, PATCH, DELETE, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept
{
"id": 940085,
"url": "https://info.mzalendo.com/api/v0.1/hansard/entries/940085/?format=api",
"text_counter": 483,
"type": "speech",
"speaker_name": "Rarieda, ODM",
"speaker_title": "Hon. (Dr.) Otiende Amollo",
"speaker": {
"id": 13465,
"legal_name": "Paul Otiende Amollo",
"slug": "paul-otiende-amollo"
},
"content": " Thank you, Hon. Temporary Deputy Chairlady. On this, I want to support the amendment. If we look at Clause 27, we should read it together with Clause 26. What are those rights of the data subject that would disentitle them from accessing because of a physical disability? If you look at the rights that have been captured, the kind of physical disability that we are talking about, including the example given by the Leader of the Majority Party, may not really apply. The danger is that once we include physical disability under this part, you will almost preclude even those who are physically disabled, but mentally or otherwise able because you will have added them here. Therefore, I suggest that we remove the word “physical” and maintain “mental”. In any other circumstance, we could have said “mental or other disability” such that it will allow the possibility that if you are disabled in such a manner that you cannot, then you can get data through an administrator. Thank you."
}