Entry Instance

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, PUT, PATCH, DELETE, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "id": 944161,
    "url": "https://info.mzalendo.com/api/v0.1/hansard/entries/944161/?format=api",
    "text_counter": 133,
    "type": "speech",
    "speaker_name": "Sen. Mutula Kilonzo Jr",
    "speaker_title": "",
    "speaker": {
        "id": 13156,
        "legal_name": "Mutula Kilonzo Jnr",
        "slug": "mutula-kilonzo-jnr"
    },
    "content": ".: Mr. Deputy Speaker, Sir, the confusion continues. Assuming that you have been served, the order would have a date of when the matter is going to proceed, which would dictate the process. The reasons Senators are confused is that assuming you have been served, the court order would say that this matter will proceed on 10th, 11th and 12th; which means we cannot proceed until the matter is heard. The third issue is not even about the 30 days. If we are not parties to that order, I would think that the wisdom would be that the Senate would be interested in that proceeding by attending to the matter to say it is unprocedural and unconstitutional for co-equals to “injunct” one another. If we cannot “injunct” the Judiciary, they should not “injunct” us. However, we should do it on the Floor of the court by telling the judge that he has made a mistake and acted unconstitutionally. The electronic version of the Senate Hansard Report is for information purposesonly. A certified version of this Report can be obtained from the Hansard Editor, Senate."
}