GET /api/v0.1/hansard/entries/953159/?format=api
HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, PUT, PATCH, DELETE, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept
{
"id": 953159,
"url": "https://info.mzalendo.com/api/v0.1/hansard/entries/953159/?format=api",
"text_counter": 189,
"type": "speech",
"speaker_name": "Gilgil, JP",
"speaker_title": "Hon. (Ms.) Martha Wangari",
"speaker": {
"id": 13123,
"legal_name": "Martha Wangari",
"slug": "martha-wangari"
},
"content": "The social worker will come to your house, but she will not find you to see how you will stay with that child because you will be away at work, unlike biological working mothers who have maternity leave. I have listened to Hon. Otiende Amollo. I have heard his reservations, even with Akuku Danger’s example. I also want to clarify that even a woman can get a child yearly, like Akuku Danger’s wives used to. That woman would still get a three-month maternity leave. It does not matter that she got a child the previous year. Such women would still qualify for maternity leave. Equally, their husbands would still qualify for paternity leave of two weeks because it is in the law. However, there is no child adoptive leave. That is why it is very critical that we introduce it and ensure that we comply with Article 53 of the Constitution, which gives children the right to protection, the right to education, the right to parental guidance and the right to proper guidance while growing up."
}