Entry Instance

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, PUT, PATCH, DELETE, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "id": 959072,
    "url": "https://info.mzalendo.com/api/v0.1/hansard/entries/959072/?format=api",
    "text_counter": 450,
    "type": "speech",
    "speaker_name": "Garissa Township, JP",
    "speaker_title": "Hon. Aden Duale",
    "speaker": {
        "id": 15,
        "legal_name": "Aden Bare Duale",
        "slug": "aden-duale"
    },
    "content": "“(2) Money may be withdrawn from the Consolidated Fund only- (a) in accordance with an appropriation by an Act of Parliament; (b) in accordance with Article 222 or 223; or (c) as a charge against the Fund as authorised by this Constitution or an Act of Parliament.” So, the only two funds that the Constitution has guaranteed and allocated money can be charged directly to the Consolidated Fund, which is the 15 per cent to county governments and the Equalisation Fund. Whether the House appropriates or not, those amounts of money can be charged. So, what was the problem and how comes we could not give the 15 per cent to counties during this impulse between the two Houses? The electronic version of the Official Hansard Report is for information purposes only. Acertified version of this Report can be obtained from the Hansard Editor."
}