GET /api/v0.1/hansard/entries/963827/?format=api
HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, PUT, PATCH, DELETE, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept
{
"id": 963827,
"url": "https://info.mzalendo.com/api/v0.1/hansard/entries/963827/?format=api",
"text_counter": 124,
"type": "speech",
"speaker_name": "The Deputy Speaker",
"speaker_title": "",
"speaker": null,
"content": "Demonstrates or makes disruptive utterances against the suspension of a named Senator.” This is in regards to the name ‘Senator,’ which does not apply. Standing Order No.117 (1)(i) states:- “Attempts to or causes disorder of whatever nature during an address by the President or a visiting dignitary pursuant to Standing Order No.25.” This is in regards to the President’s speech. However, I saw something else, which might be of interest. You have not used any violence or interrupted the Speaker’s procession or removed the mace from its place. However, you have almost committed an offence according to Standing Order No.117(m). You are bordering towards it. It states that- “commits any other breach of these Standing Orders, that is in the opinion of the Speaker, constitutes gross disorderly conduct.” So, in my opinion, I cannot entertain prejudices against men or women Members or non- members of this House. Therefore, Sen. Cherargei, the Senator for Nandi, this is the last time I will have the proceedings interrupted by so many Standing Orders relating to gender-prejudiced statements coming from you or any other Senator. On that note, I direct that we stop at that and continue. However, having said so, I absolutely see no reason in, for example, qualifying and saying that Senator so and so is either a great man. If qualification of gender is done in good faith at face value, and is not a tricky way of trying to introduce prejudice, there is nothing disorderly about that. Sen. (Eng.) Hargura asked for guidance around that issue. There is nothing wrong in saying that the distinguished Sen. Abshiro is a great lady. However, it should be said in"
}