GET /api/v0.1/hansard/entries/96481/?format=api
HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, PUT, PATCH, DELETE, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept
{
"id": 96481,
"url": "https://info.mzalendo.com/api/v0.1/hansard/entries/96481/?format=api",
"text_counter": 29,
"type": "speech",
"speaker_name": "Mr. Imanyara",
"speaker_title": "",
"speaker": {
"id": 22,
"legal_name": "Gitobu Imanyara",
"slug": "gitobu-imanyara"
},
"content": "On a point of order, Mr. Speaker, Sir. In fact, this Question, as you may be aware, was here last week. I am surprised that the answer being given today is totally different from the one that was given last week. I have my own suspicions as to whether, indeed, what he wants to do is to conduct further investigations. Last week, the Assistant Minister asked for more time up to today to produce the postmortem report which would form the basis as to whether there would be need for further investigations. He should not come and tell us that he needs more time to conduct further investigations when the issue was to lay on the Table the postmortem report, so that we know whether there is need for further investigations or a public enquiry under the Criminal Procedure Act. That is what he undertook to do this afternoon. Is it in order for him to detour from what he undertook in the House and seek more time, when we know that the circumstances under which that child died are very suspect? Personally, I have had an occasion to talk to the parents and I know that there is an absolute and compelling need for an inquiry under a district magistrate as provided for in the Criminal Procedure Code. What investigations will he carry out if he cannot even lay on the Table of the House the postmortem report?"
}