Entry Instance

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, PUT, PATCH, DELETE, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "id": 966418,
    "url": "https://info.mzalendo.com/api/v0.1/hansard/entries/966418/?format=api",
    "text_counter": 924,
    "type": "speech",
    "speaker_name": "Nominated, ANC",
    "speaker_title": "Hon. Godfrey Osotsi",
    "speaker": {
        "id": 13172,
        "legal_name": "Godfrey Osotsi",
        "slug": "godfrey-osotsi"
    },
    "content": " Hon. Temporary Deputy Chairlady, this amendment on Clause 79(b) seeks to amend what is in the parent Act that says the activity discharged is confirmed to be below the clearance level, but this amendment goes further to say that radioactivity clearance level will be prescribed by the Authority. I would like to get clarity from the Chairperson as to whether or not this contradicts with the NEMA Act given that NEMA is given the coordinating role on all matters to do with environmental activities. To what extent does this amendment contradict the NEMA Act? I am saying that because we do not want a situation where we are going to have turf wars between authorities, namely, this new Authority and NEMA on matters of environmental protection."
}