GET /api/v0.1/hansard/entries/966420/?format=api
HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, PUT, PATCH, DELETE, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "id": 966420,
    "url": "https://info.mzalendo.com/api/v0.1/hansard/entries/966420/?format=api",
    "text_counter": 926,
    "type": "speech",
    "speaker_name": "Nakuru Town East, JP",
    "speaker_title": "Hon. David Gikaria",
    "speaker": {
        "id": 2489,
        "legal_name": "David Gikaria",
        "slug": "david-gikaria"
    },
    "content": " For the first one, I have an answer. It was clear, but I am not privy to the other one. On the first one, he had asked whether there is a conflict, and it was explicit. It had said “subject to any other written law”. I am not sure about this one. This is radioactive. What does it have to do with the Mining Act? That is what I am thinking. I doubt whether in mining any radioactive waste is discharged. This is explicit on radioactive and not on mining. It could be waste from mining, but not related to radioactive. That could be the clarity."
}