GET /api/v0.1/hansard/entries/970255/?format=api
HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, PUT, PATCH, DELETE, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "id": 970255,
    "url": "https://info.mzalendo.com/api/v0.1/hansard/entries/970255/?format=api",
    "text_counter": 59,
    "type": "speech",
    "speaker_name": "Sen. Murkomen",
    "speaker_title": "The Senate Majority Leader",
    "speaker": {
        "id": 440,
        "legal_name": "Onesimus Kipchumba Murkomen",
        "slug": "kipchumba-murkomen"
    },
    "content": " Mr. Speaker, Sir, I am sorry to interrupt. I am doing this on behalf of many of our Members on this side who have asked the same. I want us to be clear. It has nothing to do with the witness who is making a presentation. We need clarity on whether your earlier ruling is in effect that the question as to the issues on the preliminary objection - as to whether there was an impeachment that took place in the county assembly or not. Is it in your ruling that it has been postponed to be determined? Will we have a question at the end that this House will make a determination on the question of whether an impeachment happened in Kiambu or not, or we are left to make a determination on the charges at the far end? That is the confusing issue about your ruling. In other words, it means that you have dispensed the preliminary objection which means that he can only use it as point of argument on the charges before us. However, the House will never have the opportunity to make a determination as to whether the issue of an impeachment having taken place in the county assembly happened or not. Will the Speaker dispense of such a serious and weighty matter without an opportunity for the House to vote in future?"
}