Entry Instance

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, PUT, PATCH, DELETE, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "id": 974456,
    "url": "https://info.mzalendo.com/api/v0.1/hansard/entries/974456/?format=api",
    "text_counter": 343,
    "type": "speech",
    "speaker_name": "Sen. Orengo",
    "speaker_title": "The Senate Minority Leader",
    "speaker": {
        "id": 129,
        "legal_name": "Aggrey James Orengo",
        "slug": "james-orengo"
    },
    "content": "that is abused by the investigating agencies. Therefore, we should do something a little better than what I have seen here. I think Sen. Farhiya is trying to point out to me that there is a provision. However, what is there is not good enough. In fact, even in The Anti-Corruption and Economic Crimes Act, there is a provision which limits that instrumentality of search and seizure. Since the provisions in The Anti-Corruption and Economic Crimes Act are limiting, they have specific provisions dealing with search and seizure. However, since they are limiting, the investigating agencies prefer going by the provisions of the Criminal Procedure Code, because its sections give the investigating agencies a lot of latitude. I can see one of them here under Clause 8 of the Bill. Its states that- “A search may be conducted without a warrant in exceptional cases where there are reasonable grounds to believe that evidence maybe removed or destroyed.”"
}