All parliamentary appearances

Entries 21 to 30 of 1215.

  • 30 May 2017 in National Assembly: Thank you, Hon. Speaker. I just want to pick up the matter from where Hon. Limo has left. I think we need to understand some of these things we discuss here. I did say last week that the reason why Article 114 of the Constitution is very important is because in the budget-making, there is the side of the revenue generation and the side of expenditure and there are a number of micro-economic factors which inform both sides. So, any time you propose an amendment like from 50 percent to 35 or 5 per cent, it means in terms of ... view
  • 30 May 2017 in National Assembly: Thank you, Hon. Chairlady. I am surprised that the Committee is proposing the deletion of Clauses 26 and 27. I thought the bone of contention was that the National Treasury had proposed 50 per cent taxation. We are proposing 35 per cent taxation. I would like to hear from the Committee what informed this decision. I oppose this in the strongest terms possible. view
  • 30 May 2017 in National Assembly: Thank you, Hon. Chairlady. I am surprised that the Committee is proposing the deletion of Clauses 26 and 27. I thought the bone of contention was that the National Treasury had proposed 50 per cent taxation. We are proposing 35 per cent taxation. I would like to hear from the Committee what informed this decision. I oppose this in the strongest terms possible. view
  • 24 May 2017 in National Assembly: Thank you, Hon. Speaker for giving me the chance to also second this important Motion. I am sure Members are aware that this is the second time we are debating this Bill - the Division of Revenue Bill. This is because the Meditation Committee could not agree. It means we have to go through the process again. Before I give my comments, I think it is important I make these opening remarks: Members remember we passed, as a House, the Budget Policy Statement view
  • 24 May 2017 in National Assembly: Thank you, Hon. Speaker for giving me the chance to also second this important Motion. I am sure Members are aware that this is the second time we are debating this Bill - the Division of Revenue Bill. This is because the Meditation Committee could not agree. It means we have to go through the process again. Before I give my comments, I think it is important I make these opening remarks: Members remember we passed, as a House, the Budget Policy Statement view
  • 18 May 2017 in National Assembly: On a point of order, Hon. Temporary Deputy Speaker. view
  • 18 May 2017 in National Assembly: On a point of order, Hon. Temporary Deputy Speaker. view
  • 18 May 2017 in National Assembly: Hon. Temporary Deputy Speaker, is the Member in order to mislead this House that this House was presented with three names for the Chief Justice when we are all very aware that we only got one name which we approved and the President assented to that approval? view
  • 18 May 2017 in National Assembly: Hon. Temporary Deputy Speaker, is the Member in order to mislead this House that this House was presented with three names for the Chief Justice when we are all very aware that we only got one name which we approved and the President assented to that approval? view
  • 18 May 2017 in National Assembly: Thank you, Hon. Temporary Deputy Speaker. I want to make my contribution to this important Motion. view