Entry Instance

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, PUT, PATCH, DELETE, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "id": 591879,
    "url": "https://info.mzalendo.com/api/v0.1/hansard/entries/591879/?format=api",
    "text_counter": 391,
    "type": "speech",
    "speaker_name": "Hon. Kajwang’",
    "speaker_title": "",
    "speaker": {
        "id": 2712,
        "legal_name": "Tom Joseph Kajwang'",
        "slug": "kajwang-tom-joseph-francis"
    },
    "content": "Let us have some sobriety in this. I accept and it is manifestly clear that this is a dangerous amendment in the way it is couched. But I think the Mover did not make it clear. When you have Ouko Investigation Committee and you send somebody to, for example, Kitale so that a witness can be summoned to be investigated before the House Committee, if you send the Serjeant-at-Arms or any of the officers, nobody will accept the summons. You will need a police officer seconded to the Parliamentary Service Commission (PSC) to serve those summons. Therefore, it is dangerous the way it is. But, can it be redrafted in such a way that gives these officers an opportunity to serve summons on anybody else that is connected with the investigations that the Committee is handling? I think that is where we are."
}