Abdikadir Mohammed

All parliamentary appearances

Entries 611 to 620 of 1092.

• 31 May 2011 in National Assembly: THAT Paragraph 10 of the Second Schedule be deleted. view
• 31 May 2011 in National Assembly: Let me just read for you what Paragraph 10 of the Second Schedule says. It says:- view
• 31 May 2011 in National Assembly: “Unless otherwise provided by or under any law, all instruments made by and decisions of the Commission shall be signified under the hand of the Chairperson and Secretary”. view
• 31 May 2011 in National Assembly: Mr. Chairman, Sir, assuming that the Commission wanted to sack its Secretary, would he require to sign that instrument too? Here we say all instruments. We do not think it is appropriate that we tie the Commission to the signature of the Secretary, who is an employee of the Commission. view
• 31 May 2011 in National Assembly: ( Question, that the words to be left out be left, view
• 31 May 2011 in National Assembly: Mr. Chairman, Sir, I beg to move:- THAT, the Fifth Schedule be deleted and substituted with the following new Schedule:- view
• 26 May 2011 in National Assembly: On a point of order, Mr. Temporary Deputy Speaker, Sir. I thought those contributions should have come at this point. However, we, in the Committee, take great exception to the decision by the Speaker. I was hoping you would hear me on this matter. This is not ordinary Government business. This is part of the constitutional implementation process. You will note that from February up to date, we, as a House, have not passed one Bill concerning implementation. This matter was hurried when it came to the House for debate. The time was shortened. The House Committee on Justice and ... view
• 26 May 2011 in National Assembly: So, for him to take those powers, to re-arrange work dealing with the Constitution when we are so much behind schedule in the process of implementation of the Constitution, especially when he makes such pronouncements about delay of this process, is completely unacceptable. It is important that this matter be recorded. If we were to proceed, we are ready. We do not see why we are delaying this matter. view
• 13 Apr 2011 in National Assembly: Thank you very much, Mr. Speaker, Sir. I actually disagree with those who are saying that it is a formality. This is a Bill before the House. This is, indeed, the law that is going to approve those appropriations. What we passed earlier on was a Resolution and the Finance Bill. So, this House has powers to amend, reject or do anything it so wishes with this Bill. So, that needs to be clarified. Mr. Speaker, Sir, secondly, if the law says 2.5 per cent, that law ought to be agreed with and implemented. Again, that is not in any ... view
• 13 Apr 2011 in National Assembly: That is why looking at the fact that 2.5 per cent is for services and the remaining 97 per cent is also for services, and looking at all the other critical services, we should not determine this based on the behaviour of Treasury but based on our duty as the National Assembly to look out for the good of the country. It is because of that reason that I disagree with the Chair of the Constituencies Development Fund (CDF) Committee that this should not move forward. But I must thank the Chair of CDF and his Committee for the diligence ... view