Daniel Lyula Khamasi

All parliamentary appearances

Entries 41 to 50 of 1770.

• 20 Sep 2007 in National Assembly: Yes, Mr. Muite, you are right. You will appreciate my directive that we want to do each section on its own because what you have referred to as the definition of the employer by the Minister comes much later. The Committee's amendment comes in part (b). So, when we get to (b) we will deal with Dr. Manduku's proposed amendment first, then if that makes a difference, we shall deal with it when we come to it. So, we will start with part (a) first then we proceed to part (b) and then we shall ask Dr. Manduku to move ... view
• 20 Sep 2007 in National Assembly: No! No! It is "collective agreement". If you look at the Order Paper, in part (a) it is talking about "collective agreement". view
• 20 Sep 2007 in National Assembly: Mr. Minister, are you using the Order Paper? It is on page 542 of the Order Paper. view
• 20 Sep 2007 in National Assembly: No, you cannot! Mr. Minister, are you using the right Order Paper? view
• 20 Sep 2007 in National Assembly: Look at page 542 on the Order Paper. September 20, 2007 PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES 4069 It is the second page. view
• 20 Sep 2007 in National Assembly: Bw. Minister, we shall move on to Clause 3(b). view
• 20 Sep 2007 in National Assembly: Hon. Members, the issue of the "employer" is in Clause 3(d). On page 562, there is a similar notice of amendment by Dr. Hezron Manduku. Dr. Manduku, you will start with the "employee". We will dispose of it and then go to Clause 3(d), which is about the "employer". view
• 20 Sep 2007 in National Assembly: You are in agreement? Yes, Mr. Sungu! view
• 20 Sep 2007 in National Assembly: Yes! Dr. Manduku, do you want to try that? What do you want to say? view
• 20 Sep 2007 in National Assembly: Can I take it that you have given notice of an amendment? view