All parliamentary appearances
Entries 291 to 300 of 17848.
-
29 Mar 2017 in Senate:
Order! I am afraid I have to enforce the Standing Orders. You had an opportunity to withdraw your remarks yesterday. You sought for more time and it was granted.
view
-
29 Mar 2017 in Senate:
You cannot withdraw and say you are still coming back with it. You cannot withdraw and start with a preface on what you think is the correct position.
view
-
29 Mar 2017 in Senate:
Order Senator. Let me explain. Resume your seat. This House gives you a lot of latitude to express yourself but when you are challenged, it becomes a different ballgame. The challenge was there yesterday. You were given up to the next day which is today. So, you cannot come back now and say you want another day. You either have the information or you do not have it. So withdraw and apologise without qualifying.
view
-
29 Mar 2017 in Senate:
Are you ceding the balance of your time to Sen. (Dr.) Khalwale?
view
-
29 Mar 2017 in Senate:
Order! Yes, but you cannot just determine that I am going to give.
view
-
29 Mar 2017 in Senate:
Order, Sen. Wetangula. The reason I gave points of order to Sen. Kembi-Gitura was because you were mentioning him. I have always said in this House that if you do not mention a name, I have no problem. I have not refused to give to Sen. (Dr.) Khalwale. How did you know if I was going to grant him or not? Sen. (Dr.) Khalwale.
view
-
29 Mar 2017 in Senate:
Order, Members. Sen. (Dr.) Khalwale, I said you were challenged to substantiate instantly. I do not know whether we read the same English. Then you are given latitude that if you cannot do it, you have up to the next day which is why I was indulging the Leader of Minority; that he can do as he requested at the end of his submission. However, having looked at the HANSARD, he was actually given up to 2:30 p.m. of the next day which is today. The time now is 4:20 p.m. I was, therefore, working on those parameters. They have ...
view
-
29 Mar 2017 in Senate:
Order Senator. On the issue of withdrawing and apologising---
view
-
29 Mar 2017 in Senate:
Order. I said it was qualified. You were not categorical.
view
-
29 Mar 2017 in Senate:
Order, Senator. I have no problem with your line of reasoning but my problem is that you have been challenged and you are unable to substantiate; which is the most honourable thing to do, especially for a senior Member of the House like you, with due respect. No additions, preface, forward and no postscript. I withdraw and apologise. Period. The electronic version of the Senate Hansard Report is for information purposes only. A certified version of this Report can be obtained from the Hansard Editor, Senate
view