All parliamentary appearances
Entries 3361 to 3370 of 17848.
-
3 Mar 2016 in Senate:
What is it, Sen. Khaniri?
view
-
3 Mar 2016 in Senate:
Even just thinking on top of my head, I will not agree with your statement that the sub judice rule does not allow Parliament to discuss any mater before the law. It depends on the particulars being canvassed before the House. The onus is on the one involving the sub judice rule to state that those matters being sought are actually before court. This has been a long debate in Parliament. That is the last resolution of it and it is what is provided for in the Standing Orders presently. Let her proceed until you find the particulars that you ...
view
-
3 Mar 2016 in Senate:
Sen. (Dr.) Khalwale, I have immense personal respect for the Senator for Vihiga, your good self and the rest of the Senators. More particularly, to the two of you, when it comes to the Standing Orders. However, I will not allow you just to demonstrate that you know the Standing Orders, especially when I have invoked them in order to mislead the House.
view
-
3 Mar 2016 in Senate:
I could have understood that initially, but surely not after I have already pronounced myself on it. At the very minimum, you should have made reference to then Standing Orders then point out the contradiction. Therefore, let me help you. Sen. Khaniri was not helping me. You are the one who needs my assistance now. Standing Order No.92(4) says:- “A Senator alleging that a matter is sub judice shall provide evidence to show that paragraphs (2) and (3) are applicable.” That was the essence of my intervention to Sen. Khaniri, That is the correct position. Proceed, Sen. Dullo! This is ...
view
-
3 Mar 2016 in Senate:
What is it, Sen. Khaniri?
view
-
3 Mar 2016 in Senate:
What is it, Sen. (Dr.) Khalwale?
view
-
3 Mar 2016 in Senate:
Sen.Kittony, on the first one, did you make reference to the two Senators that they have been compromised?
view
-
3 Mar 2016 in Senate:
Order, Sen. Kittony. I did not ask for justification. I asked for your confirmation as to whether you stated those words or not. So, do I take it from your justification that you actually stated them?
view
-
3 Mar 2016 in Senate:
Order, Senator. You do not withdraw what is not there. Did you refer to them? You need to confirm first.
view
-
3 Mar 2016 in Senate:
Hon. Senators, this is a straightforward matter. I direct Sen. Kittony to own up. Please own up the words so that you may withdraw them and then give unconditional apology. That is the procedure.
view