Erick Okong'o Mogeni

All parliamentary appearances

Entries 371 to 380 of 2473.

• 12 Mar 2024 in Senate: (a) in sub-clause (1) by deleting the words “institutional housing” appearing immediately after the words “affordable housing”; (b) in sub-clause (2) — (i) by deleting the words “ and institutional housing” appearing immediately after the words “affordable housing” in paragraph (a); and view
• 12 Mar 2024 in Senate: (ii) by deleting the words “institutional housing” appearing immediately after the words “affordable projects in paragraph (c); view
• 12 Mar 2024 in Senate: The justification is to remove institutional housing as one of the beneficiaries of affordable housing as that is not envisaged right under Article 43 of the Constitution. view
• 12 Mar 2024 in Senate: I thank you. view
• 12 Mar 2024 in Senate: The electronic version of the Senate Hansard Report is for information purposesonly. A certified version of this Report can be obtained from the Director, Hansard and AudioServices, Senate. view
• 12 Mar 2024 in Senate: Mr. Temporary Chairman, Sir, I had moved an amendment that was doing away with institutional housing. However, the amendment by Sen. Abass is retaining institutional housing, which I proposed to be deleted. I want your directions. view
• 12 Mar 2024 in Senate: Mr. Speaker, Sir, I beg to move- THAT Clause 34 of the Bill be deleted. The justification is to remove institutional development as beneficiaries of affordable housing. Thank you. view
• 12 Mar 2024 in Senate: Mr. Temporary Chairperson Sir, I want to get your direction on Clause 48. As you know, there is a High Court decision; Petition No.181 of 2023, that view
• 12 Mar 2024 in Senate: The electronic version of the Senate Hansard Report is for information purposesonly. A certified version of this Report can be obtained from the Director, Hansard and AudioServices, Senate. view
• 12 Mar 2024 in Senate: declared Section 84 of the Finance Act unconstitutional and that was the basis for the collection of these funds. So, the entire Clause 48 is unconstitutional in view of the declarations already made by the courts. It will have a retrospective application, which is not allowed. view