All parliamentary appearances
Entries 11 to 20 of 1014.
-
17 Oct 2007 in National Assembly:
Mr. Temporary Deputy Chairman, Sir, I have looked at Clause 17 of the Bill and unless the clauses have been subsequently renumbered, the Attorney-General appears to have implied that, that amendment does not seem to apply to the Clause. May be I can get some guidance.
view
-
17 Oct 2007 in National Assembly:
I am advised that this has been renumbered by the drafting officers at the Attorney-General's office. So, we have to deal with it as renumbered.
view
-
17 Oct 2007 in National Assembly:
Order, hon. Members! This is a very serious matter. The Chair will not subscribe to anything that will bring conflict among Kenyans. Whether they are Luos, Kisiis, Kalenjins or Kikuyus killed, they are all Kenyans. So, please, let us not be emotional about it. Let us not accuse other people. If you want to discuss that matter, bring a substantive Motion to discuss the matter under Standing Order No.20. However, please, let us stick to this issue and talk about it as it is rather than pointing fingers because that will raise other issues. Proceed, Mr. Angwenyi!
view
-
17 Oct 2007 in National Assembly:
Order, Mr. Angwenyi! You are right on course, except when you start accusing persons or political parties. That is bound to lead to a---
view
-
17 Oct 2007 in National Assembly:
Mr. Temporary Deputy Chairman, Sir, I want to make one comment. The proposed amendment of the new proviso is quite long. Like I said before, having just the original Bill for reference is very difficult to understand it. We do not have the redrafted version by the Attorney-General's office. So, it is very difficult for us to understand. It will be nice if the Minister would explain to us the import of this amendment, so that when we make a decision, we are clear about it.
view
-
17 Oct 2007 in National Assembly:
Order, Mr. Angwenyi! You will listen to the Chair! I am telling you that you need to simply talk on the principles and do not point accusing fingers at particular people because you have no proof. If that is a matter that you want to discuss, you can bring it under Standing Order No.20.
view
-
17 Oct 2007 in National Assembly:
Order, Mr. Wamunyinyi! Is that a point of order? Mr. Angwenyi is entitled to his own opinion and so long as he sticks to the debate, I have got no problem. Proceed, Mr. Angwenyi!
view
-
17 Oct 2007 in National Assembly:
Order, Mr. Angwenyi! You are now overstepping because you have no proof. If you have any proof, offer it now. However, do not go on making very inflammatory remarks against political parties.
view
-
17 Oct 2007 in National Assembly:
Mr. Speaker, Sir, as we adopt the Memorandum by the President and as we have now defined a new meaning to corporate membership to political parties, I wish to draw your 4558 PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES October 17, 2007 attention to the fact that Section 5(3)(a) of the Constitution may well come into play because it says that whenever Parliament is dissolved, an election of a President shall be held at the ensuing general election and at that election, each political party taking part in the general election, shall nominate one candidate for President in such a manner as will be described ...
view
-
17 Oct 2007 in National Assembly:
I will recognise Prof. Maathai and then the Government Responder thereafter.
view