All parliamentary appearances
Entries 241 to 250 of 527.
-
30 Nov 2011 in National Assembly:
On a point of order, Mr. Temporary Deputy Speaker, Sir.
view
-
30 Nov 2011 in National Assembly:
Protect me, Mr. Temporary Deputy Speaker, Sir. As long as that report is a matter in court, we cannot discuss it!
view
-
30 Nov 2011 in National Assembly:
It was in the court yesterday and the court gave it another date of 19th December and that is when we are going back to court.
view
-
30 Nov 2011 in National Assembly:
On a point of order, Mr. Temporary Deputy Speaker, Sir. As you make your ruling, that report that---
view
-
30 Nov 2011 in National Assembly:
Mr. Temporary Deputy Speaker, Sir, the report entitled: “Termites at
view
-
30 Nov 2011 in National Assembly:
is not only defamatory to the institution---
view
-
16 Nov 2011 in National Assembly:
Mr. Deputy Speaker, Sir, I would like the Minister to confirm to this House whether it is a policy of the Cabinet, the Government or the law that if a person
view
-
16 Nov 2011 in National Assembly:
On a point of order, Mr. Deputy Speaker, Sir. I only asked the hon. Minister to confirm whether any person who encroaches on another person’s land illegally, the law now or the Government’s policy is that whatever structures he has on the land must be demolished. That is all I want the Minister to address.
view
-
16 Nov 2011 in National Assembly:
On a point of order, Mr. Deputy Speaker, Sir. I am still going back again to my question to the Minister. The hon. Minister has said that unauthorized people encroached on a particular piece of land and he has given reference number. Resulting from that act, they have gone and demolished the structures. My question was; any other person who has another LR Number; does he have the same power to go and demolish without a court order? That is the question I am asking and the answer is not coming.
view
-
16 Nov 2011 in National Assembly:
Mr. Deputy Speaker, Sir, with due respect, I would want to point out that the hon. Assistant Minister is only responding to a document that the House is already seized of. The report in question was tabled before this House on 17th February. It is a document that is already the property of the House. So, there is nothing new about my character. There is nothing new about the allegations. There is nothing new; it is only a report whether good or bad that hon. Members must be informed of. That is the reason why the Statement does not really ...
view