James Orengo

All parliamentary appearances

Entries 2981 to 2990 of 4273.

• 26 Apr 2012 in National Assembly: I do not know but the part should have some title at least. view
• 26 Apr 2012 in National Assembly: Under the Attorney-General’s powers, they can give a title to the remaining part. But if you look at that part dealing with co- tenancy and partition from Clause 57 which deals with co-tenancy and then Clause 60 on partition, that is all deleted. If you go to Clause 63, you will find that it is still about partition. Then you go to the sub-part on leases and general provisions. So, it is co- tenancy and partition. view
• 26 Apr 2012 in National Assembly: Mr. Temporary Deputy Chairman, Sir, after Clause 56, it all goes up to Clause 64. Under Clause 64, you find leases, general provisions. So, that Part VI should now read “leases-general provisions”. view
• 26 Apr 2012 in National Assembly: Mr. Temporary Deputy Chairman, Sir, I am holding in my hand the Land Registration Bill which we went through yesterday and, indeed, hon. Musyimi pointed out that similar provisions are found in the Land Bill anticipating what we were going to do today. So, the whole of Part IX in the Land Registration Bill is on co-tenancy and partitioning, then Clause 93 - meaning and incidence of co-tenancies and the certificate of ownership. These are the same provisions. view
• 26 Apr 2012 in National Assembly: There is a provision in the Land Registration Bill and I think my learned friend is very concerned about spousal rights. Clause 95 of the Bill that we passed through the Third Reading yesterday, subject to the law on matrimonial property, says that if a spouse obtains land for the co-ownership and use of both spouses or all the spouses and it continues, determining situations where spousal rights will emerge and how they would be effected. The same provisions were being repeated in the Land Bill. view
• 26 Apr 2012 in National Assembly: Mr. Temporary Deputy Chairman, Sir, if land is held in the name of one spouse co-owned by the other spouse, it is all about spousal rights. view
• 26 Apr 2012 in National Assembly: Other than the fact that some of the provisions are in the Land Registration Bill, the deletion of this chapter or this part - the ones that have been proposed for deletion - was a bit controversial in the sense that the provisions were making it very difficult for landlords to recover possession of premises or to terminate leases. Therefore, the business community was very unhappy with those provisions. But looking at them again and again, I think I support the deletion. view
• 26 Apr 2012 in National Assembly: Mr. Temporary Deputy Chairman, Sir, I support this amendment because it supports our men. view
• 26 Apr 2012 in National Assembly: Yes, Mr. Temporary Deputy Chairman, Sir. view
• 26 Apr 2012 in National Assembly: Mr. Temporary Deputy Chairman, Sir, I beg to move:- view