James Orengo

All parliamentary appearances

Entries 3831 to 3840 of 4273.

• 12 Aug 2010 in National Assembly: SUB-VOTE 360 – GENERAL ADMINISTRATION AND PLANNING view
• 12 Aug 2010 in National Assembly: ( Heads 026,576 and 615 agreed to) view
• 12 Aug 2010 in National Assembly: SUB-VOTE 362 – LAND ADJUDICATION AND SETTLEMENT view
• 12 Aug 2010 in National Assembly: SUB-VOTE 363 – SURVEY OF KENYA view
• 12 Aug 2010 in National Assembly: SUB-VOTE 364 – LANDS view
• 12 Aug 2010 in National Assembly: SUB-VOTE 367 – PHYSICAL PLANNING view
• 12 Aug 2010 in National Assembly: Madam Temporary Deputy Chairperson, I do not want to put my colleague in an embarrassing position. Let me put it this way. But I am a firm believer in the supremacy of the House. If you look at the Congress in the USA, if a matter like this arose, the implementer of executive decisions, even if he is a commander in the fields, would normally be recalled to appear before Parliament because it is supreme. Indeed, we are just being very gentle in the way we are undergoing the Committee Stage because we are supposed to scrutinize every little figure ... view
• 12 Aug 2010 in National Assembly: Mr. Temporary Deputy Speaker, Sir, I beg to move that the House doth agree with the Committee in the said Resolution. view
• 24 Jun 2010 in National Assembly: Mr. Temporary Deputy Speaker, Sir, I also wish to congratulate hon. Mututho, particularly when I find myself sitting next to hon. Michuki. I remember he made a lot of efforts towards this course. Parliament was a little bit different those days, but now, hon. Michuki’s dream has come true, thanks to hon. Mututho. Mr. Temporary Deputy Speaker, Sir, in saying so and adding a word to what Dr. Khalwale has said, a gentleman may drink because he needs a reason to go to the club, but a perfect gentleman will only drink to have something little to put him to ... view
• 24 Jun 2010 in National Assembly: Mr. Temporary Deputy Speaker, Sir, I wish to support this Motion and make very few remarks. When we are considering this issue, we should go back to the law that was enacted by this Parliament and ask ourselves: Do these three persons qualify in accordance with the statute that we enacted? In my humble submission, on all considerations and all imperatives that we can consider, they qualify. view