Tom Joseph Kajwang'

Parties & Coalitions

All parliamentary appearances

Entries 1931 to 1940 of 10308.

  • 8 Mar 2016 in National Assembly: Hon. Speaker, I beg to report that a Committee of the whole House has considered the Natural Resources (Classes of Transactions Subject to Ratification) Bill (National Assembly Bill No. 54 of 2015) and approved the same with amendments. view
  • 8 Mar 2016 in National Assembly: This is the Committee of the whole House constituted to reconsider the Natural Resources (Classes of Transactions Subject to Ratification) Bill (National Assembly Bill No. 54 of 2015). This will only consider a specific item which is the first item of the schedule. So, I shall call the Schedule for re-committal. view
  • 8 Mar 2016 in National Assembly: Let us have the Whip of the Majority Party. I beg your pardon! I have just been corrected by my advisors at the Table that the owner of this re-committal is now the Member with the re-committal. So, shall I hear from the Member for Seme? view
  • 8 Mar 2016 in National Assembly: Please, move nearer to the microphone so that we can hear you fully. view
  • 8 Mar 2016 in National Assembly: I will entertain a few interventions, starting with those that I have not heard. Let us have the Hon. Member for Nambale. view
  • 8 Mar 2016 in National Assembly: All right. I want to give some directions as we go on. Order, Members! I need to take some direction on this. When you look at your Standing Order No. 85 (1) and (3) it states:- view
  • 8 Mar 2016 in National Assembly: “(1) It shall be out of order to anticipate the debate of a Bill which has been published as such in the Gazette by discussion upon a substantive Motion or an amendment, or by raising the subject matter of the Bill upon a Motion for the adjournment of the House. view
  • 8 Mar 2016 in National Assembly: (3) In determining whether a debate is out of order on the grounds of anticipation, regard shall be to the probability of the matter anticipated being brought before the House within a reasonable time.” view
  • 8 Mar 2016 in National Assembly: You people have adverted to a Bill which is on the Order Paper. In other words, the probability that, that Bill is before the House is almost 90 per cent. So, I am reading Standing Order No. 85, which is the situation that this Standing Order has in mind. So, the idea of discussing a Bill which is before us in the next Order will be out of order, if you keep on going in that direction. Hon. Member for Seme, do not be very happy because you are the one who has opened it, discussed The electronic version of ... view
  • 8 Mar 2016 in National Assembly: it and even quoted that Section. So, can you stay away from the discussion of all those sections and legislations which are pending before us because according to your own Standing Orders, they become anticipated debate? Let us have a discussion without reference to those things. view

Comments

(For newest comments first please choose 'Newest' from the 'Discussion' tab below.)
comments powered by Disqus