Tom Joseph Kajwang'

All parliamentary appearances

Entries 3151 to 3160 of 10308.

• 29 Sep 2015 in National Assembly: Yes, Mover. The Deputy Leader of the Majority Party, you are the one moving. This is your Bill. view
• 29 Sep 2015 in National Assembly: All right. Did you move that properly? I did not feel you moving it properly. It is easy if you just say that you move that it be amended as it is in the Order Paper and then you can, of course, amplify after that. So, can we hear you again moving it in conventional terms on the HANSARD? view
• 29 Sep 2015 in National Assembly: THAT, the Bill be amended in the Schedule- (a) in the proposed amendments to the Transition to Devolved Government Act, 2012 (No. 1 of 2012) by deleting the proposed new subsection (5B) proposed to be inserted in section 23; (b) in the proposed amendments to the County Governments Act, 2012 (No. 17 of 2012)- (i) by deleting the proposed amendment to section 26(2); (ii) by deleting all the proposed amendments to section 54; (iii) by deleting the proposed new section 139; view
• 29 Sep 2015 in National Assembly: No, just a minute. You should say, “THAT, the Bill be amended as proposed in the Order Paper.” view
• 29 Sep 2015 in National Assembly: Allow me to propose it first then you can amplify. view
• 29 Sep 2015 in National Assembly: All right, you can now amplify now that I have proposed it. view
• 29 Sep 2015 in National Assembly: You cannot oppose your own amendment, can you? What amendment are you opposing? view
• 29 Sep 2015 in National Assembly: All right. I have been consulting. Thank you, Deputy Leader of the Majority Party. Hon. Members, so that we are together, these are amendments proposed by the Senate. So, we are considering them. I need the Deputy Leader of Majority Party to be clear where we have reached. I suggest that we consider them in bits. Let us consider 1(a) first of all so that I hear you clearly on whether you are sustaining them or rejecting them. Let us start by 1(a) and be very clear on your instructions. Repeat yourself on 1(a) alone. view
• 29 Sep 2015 in National Assembly: I agree with you but I want you to address me in conventional terms. For example, if you are accepting number 1(a), you should address me that you wish to sustain the amendments proposed in (a). If you are rejecting, you wish to reject the amendments proposed in (a), first of all before you amplify. You are doing very well. Do not pass the baton. You are doing very well. view
• 29 Sep 2015 in National Assembly: Proceed. We just want to be clear on the HANSARD. If you are sustaining, meaning you are accepting then you say you want to sustain. view