Tom Joseph Kajwang'

All parliamentary appearances

Entries 4601 to 4610 of 10308.

• 2 Apr 2015 in National Assembly: Member for Rarieda, did you have another amendment other than (a) and (b)? Which is this? Can you lead us to it on the Order Paper? Give us the page of the Order Paper. view
• 2 Apr 2015 in National Assembly: Member for Rarieda, we had agreed that if the amendment by the Chairman is carried as it has then your amendments to Clause 7 are dropped. The electronic version of the Official Hansard Report is for information purposesonly. A certified version of this Report can be obtained from the Hansard Editor. view
• 2 Apr 2015 in National Assembly: Hold on. Before you raise a point of order, a matter should be proposed before the Assembly. Then we can discuss it. I hear you perfectly, but allow me to also get my processes working. view
• 2 Apr 2015 in National Assembly: Hold on. Before you raise a point of order, a matter should be proposed before the Assembly. Then we can discuss it. I hear you perfectly, but allow me to also get my processes working. view
• 2 Apr 2015 in National Assembly: No. Can we go to the Member for Ugenya? Where are you? On the deletion of paragraph (f), please. view
• 2 Apr 2015 in National Assembly: This will then read that ―Where an audit report has been tabled, the Speaker of the National Assembly shall invite the Auditor-General to present the report before the National Assembly. That is what we have. Can I now hear you, starting with the Member for Tongaren? view
• 2 Apr 2015 in National Assembly: This will then read that ―Where an audit report has been tabled, the Speaker of the National Assembly shall invite the Auditor-General to present the report before the National Assembly. That is what we have. Can I now hear you, starting with the Member for Tongaren? view
• 2 Apr 2015 in National Assembly: Member for Ugenya, have you addressed yourself to paragraph (b) of your amendment? You seem to have gone a little wider than you should. view
• 2 Apr 2015 in National Assembly: That may be so. I hear you, but listen to two issues. First, this phrase, ―Committee of the whole House‖ is not a legal phrase, so to speak. There is no legislation that has defined it. It is in the Standing Order No.1. Secondly, when something has been committed to the National Assembly, the Standing Orders themselves will show you that it will stand committed to the relevant Committee. So, it is the privilege of the Speaker to decide to which Committee that report will go, whether it is a joint Committee or the Committee of the whole House. It, ... view
• 2 Apr 2015 in National Assembly: That may be so. I hear you, but listen to two issues. First, this phrase, ―Committee of the whole House‖ is not a legal phrase, so to speak. There is no legislation that has defined it. It is in the Standing Order No.1. Secondly, when something has been committed to the National Assembly, the Standing Orders themselves will show you that it will stand committed to the relevant Committee. So, it is the privilege of the Speaker to decide to which Committee that report will go, whether it is a joint Committee or the Committee of the whole House. It, ... view