Tom Joseph Kajwang'

All parliamentary appearances

Entries 5671 to 5680 of 10308.

• 24 Feb 2015 in National Assembly: Member for Mbita, that is a very important point. We wrestled with that issue. Even as you debate this Bill, we do not have a Report from the Departmental Committee to help you zero into some of the issues The electronic version of the Official Hansard Report is for information purposesonly. A certified version of this Report can be obtained from the Hansard Editor. view
• 24 Feb 2015 in National Assembly: you want to bring up. We had expected that the Committee would take notes as you debate so that by the time you are done, there is a comprehensive report that can help you in the Committee. So, it is an issue of concern but your own Standing Orders leaves the Speaker with very little to do. Under your Standing Orders, all I am supposed to do is to note it to the Liaison Committee but even that is not very effective. I hope that the Mover of the Bill, whom I also do not see in the House, will ... view
• 24 Feb 2015 in National Assembly: While I appreciate your logic, how do you want to achieve it? The tribes as I understand are now 43 including the Abasuba, is it not? Here we are talking about the review panels which should be regionally balanced. How do you want to achieve 43 tribes in all these panels? view
• 24 Feb 2015 in National Assembly: Thank you. It is fair enough. Hon. Member for Ugenya. view
• 24 Feb 2015 in National Assembly: Are you planning to assist the National Assembly in doing that? view
• 24 Feb 2015 in National Assembly: Which clause are you reading? view
• 24 Feb 2015 in National Assembly: This percentage could be 0.1! view
• 24 Feb 2015 in National Assembly: Which will be prescribed in the regulations. view
• 24 Feb 2015 in National Assembly: Probably, therefore, it is a regulation that one would have to find out--- view
• 24 Feb 2015 in National Assembly: Then, it talks about what happens after the aggrieved party pays a percentage. How about where the person applying for judicial review is not necessarily an aggrieved party in the sense of being a party to that tender, but who thinks that there has been some administrative malfeasance? view