Tom Joseph Kajwang'

Parties & Coalitions

All parliamentary appearances

Entries 6521 to 6530 of 10308.

  • 27 Aug 2014 in National Assembly: Order, hon. Members! You have heard remarks to the Chair who brought you back to a vote. Can I have order in the House? Those Members on the gangway consulting, please--- You have heard the remarks from the Chair. The Chair has returned you to a vote. So, this time, vote knowing what you are talking about and vote consciously so that we get it over with. view
  • 27 Aug 2014 in National Assembly: No! Just persuade hon. Members one way or the other and we take a vote and it is done. view
  • 27 Aug 2014 in National Assembly: The electronic version of the Official Hansard Report is for information purposesonly. A certified version of this Report can be obtained from the Hansard Editor. view
  • 27 Aug 2014 in National Assembly: I think you are very legitimate. It is correct. He does not know the reason why the person requested for the recommittal. The Chair is saying that it is not upon him to explain. It is upon the Member for Kipipiri to explain because he is the one who moved for the recommital. view
  • 27 Aug 2014 in National Assembly: Yes, the Member for Kipipiri. view
  • 27 Aug 2014 in National Assembly: Order! Just a minute! You know you can take the Chair round until the Chair gets confused, but this Chair will not get confused. I will give you the background of this amendment. There was a withdrawal of h(i), a question was put and the “Nays” had it. This means that it was negatived. After that, we were voting on the clause without the amendments. That was going back to the Bill as it were. Then a few Members, notably the Member for Kigumo took issue with Clause 3(g). The Chair by oversight because the Chair can only act by ... view
  • 27 Aug 2014 in National Assembly: So, now it is back to you to now express yourself and let it be in the HANSARD that you knew what you were doing. So, perhaps, to be fair to you, can I have the Member for Kigumo making a small discussion on this and then we can put it to vote? The situation where we are is this: We are not considering what you see there as Clause 3(1). That one was disposed of. The point where we are is that we are back to the clause in the Bill. So, the question is that we want to ... view
  • 27 Aug 2014 in National Assembly: The HANSARD will bear me out. If I remember very clearly, we are back to the original Bill before the amendment. So, I have proposed the Question on Clause 3 as gazetted. Since I heard your contribution around this subject, I have allowed you to speak. view
  • 27 Aug 2014 in National Assembly: Not in favour. Just drop or withdraw your amendments. Speak to the HANSARD. view
  • 27 Aug 2014 in National Assembly: Hon. Member for Kigumo. view

Comments

(For newest comments first please choose 'Newest' from the 'Discussion' tab below.)
comments powered by Disqus