5 Dec 2013 in National Assembly:
Do you know that what you have just discussed, unless it is well substantiated can lead you to get out of the Chamber?
view
5 Dec 2013 in National Assembly:
Could you, please
view
5 Dec 2013 in National Assembly:
Hon. Njagagua
view
5 Dec 2013 in National Assembly:
For the benefit of the Members, who is a judgment debtor?
view
5 Dec 2013 in National Assembly:
How about when it is on subrogation? Are you familiar with that? I know that you are familiar with that. If, for example, the claim here is a second litigation on subrogation rights by the insurance, does the judgment debtor also not have a claim to make?
view
5 Dec 2013 in National Assembly:
So, what is the substance of your further amendment?
view
5 Dec 2013 in National Assembly:
Hon. Members, there is a further amendment by hon. Charles Muriuki that we remove the word “debtor” appearing on the second line---
view
5 Dec 2013 in National Assembly:
Let me propose that there is further amendment by hon. Charles Njagagua to remove the words “judgment debtor” so that the sentence will read: “No judgment or claim shall be payable by the insurer unless the claimant had---” Chairman of the Departmental Committee, how does that sit with you?
view
5 Dec 2013 in National Assembly:
Let me take a few interventions from seasoned litigators. Let me start with Alice Wahome. Help us here. There is just that part to clarify.
view
5 Dec 2013 in National Assembly:
Yes, you can replace it with a decree holder, but I think this is speaking to the fact that the two people, namely, the defendant and the plaintiff should have presented themselves for medical examination. This is what this is talking about. It is post judgment, that is why they are talking about judgment, but I think it should be a decree---
view