Tom Joseph Kajwang'

All parliamentary appearances

Entries 8861 to 8870 of 10308.

• 3 Dec 2013 in National Assembly: You are protected. You cannot be aggressive to a Member. Just press that button and that is enough. view
• 3 Dec 2013 in National Assembly: All right. Thank you. Let me hear also from someone who has not spoken. Richard Moitalel ole Kenta. view
• 3 Dec 2013 in National Assembly: The problem I am having on this is not what you are debating because you are free to debate. However, hon. ole Ntutu, go back to your proposal. This is on page 538 of the Supplementary Order Paper. Without speaking to all those issues you are debating, Subsection 2 says that the Service shall consider the recommendations made under Subsection 2 and where appropriate within three weeks from the receipt of the recommendations, pay compensation. For me, to subject a national authority to pay within three weeks is unreasonable. Do you not think that you are persuaded to remove those ... view
• 3 Dec 2013 in National Assembly: where appropriate, pay compensation to the claimant? That is food for thought and I am coming back to that. Hon. Musimba, you are an independent Member and I need to recognize you in this House. view
• 3 Dec 2013 in National Assembly: You know it is good to give your people a lot of money but you may also want to leave the judicial machinery to put the chips where they belong. Once you have capped it at Kshs2 million, you may want to allow the judicial machinery to know whether it is now Kshs500,000, Kshs2 million, Kshs20 or Kshs50. I think we want to get out of this. Hon. Chair, could I hear you on this? That is perhaps the last intervention on this matter. Hon. ole Ntutu will have a right to reply. view
• 3 Dec 2013 in National Assembly: Thank you, I have heard you. First, I think that is very brilliant. The Member has said that we now have a phrase “a maximum” meaning that the judicial processes will, within zero to the maximum, decide where it belongs. Secondly, did I hear the Chair to be saying that we change the word “Service” to “Cabinet Secretary” because you said that it is not the Service which is paying but the Cabinet Secretary? view
• 3 Dec 2013 in National Assembly: No, I think there is also a problem there. This is because when you come to enforcing that under Cap. 40 of the Government Proceedings Act, enforcing the order against the Government will be very difficult. You may now have to enforce it against the Attorney-General. So, it will give members of the public a very difficult time trying to realize their order. Who actually pays this? view
• 3 Dec 2013 in National Assembly: And the Fund is charged to the Exchequer? view
• 3 Dec 2013 in National Assembly: The Chair of the Committee is proposing that hon. ole Ntutu’s amendment be further amended by deleting the word “Service” and substituting it with “Cabinet Secretary” wherever it appears in his amendment. Hon. Chair, did I also hear you to be saying that you delete these words within three weeks from the date of receipt of the recommendations? view
• 3 Dec 2013 in National Assembly: So, another of your proposal is to delete those words when they appear in Subsection 2(a) and include the words “a maximum” in paragraph (a) after the word “death” and then the words “a maximum” after the word “disability” on paragraph (d) and then the words “a maximum” in place of the words “not more than.” Are those the amendments? view