Martha Karua

Parties & Coalitions

Full name

Martha Wangari Karua

Born

22nd September 1957

Post

P.O. Box 9021, Nairobi, Kenya

Post

Parliament Buildings
Parliament Rd.
P.O Box 41842 – 00100
Nairobi, Kenya

Email

gichugu@parliament.go.ke

Link

Facebook

Web

www.joinmarthakarua.com

Telephone

0721 623 342

Telephone

020 2221291 Ext 32548

Telephone

0733 747551

Link

@MarthaKarua on Twitter

All parliamentary appearances

Entries 191 to 200 of 2953.

  • 23 Aug 2012 in National Assembly: To that extent then, I am moving this amendment as was proposed by the Committee. view
  • 23 Aug 2012 in National Assembly: To that extent then, I am moving this amendment as was proposed by the Committee. view
  • 23 Aug 2012 in National Assembly: To that extent then, I am moving this amendment as was proposed by the Committee. view
  • 23 Aug 2012 in National Assembly: Madam Temporary Deputy Chairlady, taking cue from where the Member has left, I oppose the clause because the original Committee’s amendment is saving the public officer from that position of conflict of interest, where we have to wait for you not to influence. We are stopping you from tendering. We are stopping you beforehand. We are telling you that you cannot have your cake and eat it. The amendment of hon. Langat is killing that. We are, therefore, saying “business as usual”. Scandals are made from officers being in positions of conflict. We are trying to stop that and that ... view
  • 23 Aug 2012 in National Assembly: Madam Temporary Deputy Chairlady, taking cue from where the Member has left, I oppose the clause because the original Committee’s amendment is saving the public officer from that position of conflict of interest, where we have to wait for you not to influence. We are stopping you from tendering. We are stopping you beforehand. We are telling you that you cannot have your cake and eat it. The amendment of hon. Langat is killing that. We are, therefore, saying “business as usual”. Scandals are made from officers being in positions of conflict. We are trying to stop that and that ... view
  • 23 Aug 2012 in National Assembly: Madam Temporary Deputy Chairlady, taking cue from where the Member has left, I oppose the clause because the original Committee’s amendment is saving the public officer from that position of conflict of interest, where we have to wait for you not to influence. We are stopping you from tendering. We are stopping you beforehand. We are telling you that you cannot have your cake and eat it. The amendment of hon. Langat is killing that. We are, therefore, saying “business as usual”. Scandals are made from officers being in positions of conflict. We are trying to stop that and that ... view
  • 23 Aug 2012 in National Assembly: Mr. Temporary Deputy Chairman, Sir, I think that this amendment is regrettable and ought to be opposed. What really Clauses 40(1)(2) are doing is putting an obligation on any public entity to which one belongs professionally to forward the information to the relevant authority. If I am a lawyer and I have been dis-barred by the Law Society of Kenya (LSK), they should forward that information. You know, they are talking of a fair administrative procedure. So, if your professional body is not fair, you can go to court and challenge it. But if you are going to say that: ... view
  • 23 Aug 2012 in National Assembly: Mr. Temporary Deputy Chairman, Sir, I think that this amendment is regrettable and ought to be opposed. What really Clauses 40(1)(2) are doing is putting an obligation on any public entity to which one belongs professionally to forward the information to the relevant authority. If I am a lawyer and I have been dis-barred by the Law Society of Kenya (LSK), they should forward that information. You know, they are talking of a fair administrative procedure. So, if your professional body is not fair, you can go to court and challenge it. But if you are going to say that: ... view
  • 23 Aug 2012 in National Assembly: Mr. Temporary Deputy Chairman, Sir, I think that this amendment is regrettable and ought to be opposed. What really Clauses 40(1)(2) are doing is putting an obligation on any public entity to which one belongs professionally to forward the information to the relevant authority. If I am a lawyer and I have been dis-barred by the Law Society of Kenya (LSK), they should forward that information. You know, they are talking of a fair administrative procedure. So, if your professional body is not fair, you can go to court and challenge it. But if you are going to say that: ... view
  • 23 Aug 2012 in National Assembly: Mr. Temporary Deputy Chairman, Sir, this amendment is very important. You will recall that we are enjoined by the Constitution to make a freedom of information Act. Any justifiable exceptions will come under that Act after we properly analyze it. But a blanket condemnation and a very heavy penalty of Kshs5 million, this is is taking us to the dark era. I support the amendment. view

Comments

(For newest comments first please choose 'Newest' from the 'Discussion' tab below.)
comments powered by Disqus