Martha Karua

All parliamentary appearances

Entries 571 to 580 of 2953.

• 21 Dec 2011 in National Assembly: Mr. Speaker, Sir, this is an amazing country. Jobs appear to go to the best bidders and also tenders appear to go to the best bidders. So that we understand this process, could the Minister table the list of all the bidders, those shortlisted and then we can understand how you did well? view
• 21 Dec 2011 in National Assembly: Mr. Speaker, Sir, this is an amazing country. Jobs appear to go to the best bidders and also tenders appear to go to the best bidders. So that we understand this process, could the Minister table the list of all the bidders, those shortlisted and then we can understand how you did well? view
• 21 Dec 2011 in National Assembly: On a point of order, Mr. Speaker, Sir. The Minister is citing the law. The Constitution is superior to any other law. Once the Constitution talks of regional, ethnic balance and all that, any law that has not been amended becomes null and void to the extent of the consistency. Is he in order to try and hide behind the law for a contract that was obviously unconstitutional? view
• 21 Dec 2011 in National Assembly: On a point of order, Mr. Speaker, Sir. The Minister is citing the law. The Constitution is superior to any other law. Once the Constitution talks of regional, ethnic balance and all that, any law that has not been amended becomes null and void to the extent of the consistency. Is he in order to try and hide behind the law for a contract that was obviously unconstitutional? view
• 21 Dec 2011 in National Assembly: On a point of order, Mr. Speaker, Sir. The Minister is citing the law. The Constitution is superior to any other law. Once the Constitution talks of regional, ethnic balance and all that, any law that has not been amended becomes null and void to the extent of the consistency. Is he in order to try and hide behind the law for a contract that was obviously unconstitutional? view
• 21 Dec 2011 in National Assembly: On a point of order, Mr. Speaker, Sir. The Minister is citing the law. The Constitution is superior to any other law. Once the Constitution talks of regional, ethnic balance and all that, any law that has not been amended becomes null and void to the extent of the consistency. Is he in order to try and hide behind the law for a contract that was obviously unconstitutional? view
• 21 Dec 2011 in National Assembly: Mr. Speaker, Sir, I am not at all contesting your ruling and interpretation. However, the Minister having agreed that he can table the information, would it be in order to seek that even if it is not today, because you are quite right that he may not have anticipated, that we request that he gives a date when he will table that information to the House which is necessary for the understanding of the question? view
• 21 Dec 2011 in National Assembly: Mr. Speaker, Sir, I am not at all contesting your ruling and interpretation. However, the Minister having agreed that he can table the information, would it be in order to seek that even if it is not today, because you are quite right that he may not have anticipated, that we request that he gives a date when he will table that information to the House which is necessary for the understanding of the question? view
• 21 Dec 2011 in National Assembly: Mr. Speaker, Sir, I am not at all contesting your ruling and interpretation. However, the Minister having agreed that he can table the information, would it be in order to seek that even if it is not today, because you are quite right that he may not have anticipated, that we request that he gives a date when he will table that information to the House which is necessary for the understanding of the question? view
• 21 Dec 2011 in National Assembly: Mr. Speaker, Sir, I am not at all contesting your ruling and interpretation. However, the Minister having agreed that he can table the information, would it be in order to seek that even if it is not today, because you are quite right that he may not have anticipated, that we request that he gives a date when he will table that information to the House which is necessary for the understanding of the question? view