Millie Grace Akoth Odhiambo Mabona

All parliamentary appearances

Entries 81 to 90 of 6553.

• 17 May 2022 in National Assembly: Hon. Temporary Deputy Chairman, I beg to move: THAT Clause 134 of the Bill be amended in sub-clause (1)— (a) by deleting the word “and” appearing immediately after the word “receive” in paragraph (a) and substituting therefor the word “or”; (b) by inserting the words “or misleading” immediately after the word “false” in paragraph (c) The electronic version of the Official Hansard Report is for information purposesonly. A certified version of this Report can be obtained from the Hansard Editor. view
• 17 May 2022 in National Assembly: (c) by deleting the word “exceeding” appearing immediately after the word “fine not” and substituting therefor the words “of not less than” Hon. Temporary Deputy Chairman, I am moving my amendment with a further amendment to sub-clause (c). I am going to explain why. The other ones are really simple amendments. In the first one, we are removing “and” after the word “receive” because then we are dealing with a disjunctive and not a conjunctive issue. We are also adding the word “misleading” so that it is not just false but also misleading in the Bill. However, I was proposing ... view
• 17 May 2022 in National Assembly: Let me explain myself. I think the reason why it might be a problem, because I am allowed to do a further amendment to my own amendment… Let me take them one by one. My first proposal in Clause 134 of the Bill is that it be amended in sub-clause (1) by deleting the word “and” after the word “receive”. Hon. Temporary Deputy Chairman, I hope you are following me on that one because it would give it a totally different meaning. Then by inserting the words “or misleading” immediately after the word “false” in paragraph (c). view
• 17 May 2022 in National Assembly: Hon. Temporary Deputy Chairman, then I am going to the offences. My proposal was to delete the word “exceeding”. I have actually been helped because we had a meeting earlier. What I am doing is to drop the word… I think this is confusing me further. Let me just go the way I was going. What I had proposed earlier in the last one because we have agreed on the first two, my original proposal was to delete the word “exceeding” after the words “fine not” and substitute with the words “of not less than”. What I am saying is ... view
• 17 May 2022 in National Assembly: Hon. Millie and the Chair have amendments to this. We will start with the Chair. view
• 17 May 2022 in National Assembly: Hon. Temporary Deputy Chairman, I beg to move: THAT Clause 136 of the Bill be amended in sub-clause (2) by inserting the following new paragraph immediately after paragraph (e)— view
• 17 May 2022 in National Assembly: “(f) an interested person”. Hon. Temporary Deputy Chairman, I propose to move my amendment again with a further amendment. It is similar to the previous ones I had moved where I had proposed an amendment by putting an interested person but, instead, we are using the terminology “a person acting on behalf and in the best interest of the child”. I will be handing over this just to help the technical team follow. view
• 17 May 2022 in National Assembly: The electronic version of the Official Hansard Report is for information purposesonly. A certified version of this Report can be obtained from the Hansard Editor. view
• 17 May 2022 in National Assembly: Hon. Temporary Deputy Chairman, I beg to move: view
• 17 May 2022 in National Assembly: THAT, Clause 140 of the Bill be amended in sub-clause (1) by inserting the following new paragraph immediately after paragraph (d)— view