15 Oct 2019 in Senate:
I cannot confirm that.
view
15 Oct 2019 in Senate:
All I can confirm is that I have tabled a letter here by M/S Havi and Company Advocates that was received by the Senate.
view
15 Oct 2019 in Senate:
I am not arguing that it is a court order. In the same manner in which you requested me to table it, I am just describing what I have tabled.
view
15 Oct 2019 in Senate:
Mr. Deputy Speaker, Sir, I have just tabled the letter and you have not scrutinized it, how then would you know what I have tabled?
view
15 Oct 2019 in Senate:
Mr. Deputy Speaker, Sir, allow me then to conclude my submission.
view
15 Oct 2019 in Senate:
Thank you, Mr. Deputy Speaker, Sir. I am glad that you have reaffirmed that I am entitled to my opinion just as everyone else is entitled to their various opinions whether we agree with them or not. The point I am trying to make is looking at the dates when we received the communication from the county assembly to today, we have acknowledged that the Senate has received a letter of a certain nature. However, it might not be a court order or what satisfies your thinking. Prudence demands that once the Senate starts a process, which we have agreed ...
view
15 Oct 2019 in Senate:
Mr. Deputy Speaker, Sir, I am contributing to the Motion.
view
15 Oct 2019 in Senate:
Mr. Deputy Speaker, Sir, I started by saying that I oppose the Motion. I am giving reasons why I oppose it.
view
15 Oct 2019 in Senate:
Mr. Deputy Speaker, Sir, my position remains that I oppose this Motion. Even if the Motion was to do this by plenary, I would have opposed it. This is because I believe that we have not gotten to the point of establishing a Committee to investigate this matter. I believe that we have ignored certain correspondences that would have added value to our decision on this matter. Mr. Deputy Speaker, Sir, I oppose.
view
15 Oct 2019 in Senate:
On a point of order, Mr. Deputy Speaker, Sir.
view