Mutahi Kagwe

All parliamentary appearances

Entries 501 to 510 of 960.

• 15 Aug 2014 in Senate: Thank you very much, Mr. Speaker, Sir. From the outset, I want to thank all Senators. This is because the fact that we hold different views does not seem to affect the relationship between the various Senators. Mr. Speaker, Sir, I also want to particularly thank the Committee that dealt with this issue. On many nights we argued and disagreed on these issues and eventually agreed on most of them. In fact, out of a line of 24 issues that we were supposed to discuss, we agreed on all of them, except three. Therefore, the fact that we did disagree ... view
• 15 Aug 2014 in Senate: Mr. Speaker, Sir, I want to tell my friend, Sen. Boni Khalwale, that if he reads that particular affidavit, one of lines reads:- “I confirm that I am an expert in Kikamba language.” Sen. (Dr.) Khalwale clearly is not an expert in Kamba language, just as much as I am not. Therefore, when I am told, in a sworn affidavit, that somebody knows the language, I presume that he knows it. I have no otherwise. Mr. Speaker, Sir, if you look at--- view
• 15 Aug 2014 in Senate: Mr. Speaker, Sir, I want to tell my friend, Sen. Boni Khalwale, that if he reads that particular affidavit, one of lines reads:- “I confirm that I am an expert in Kikamba language.” Sen. (Dr.) Khalwale clearly is not an expert in Kamba language, just as much as I am not. Therefore, when I am told, in a sworn affidavit, that somebody knows the language, I presume that he knows it. I have no otherwise. Mr. Speaker, Sir, if you look at--- view
• 15 Aug 2014 in Senate: Yes, Mr. Speaker, Sir, let me give the professors a chance. view
• 15 Aug 2014 in Senate: Yes, Mr. Speaker, Sir, let me give the professors a chance. view
• 15 Aug 2014 in Senate: Mr. Speaker, Sir, be that as it may, we were sitting as eleven people in a House, out of who each one of those eleven people is a respected and able individual to make a decision. We were not sitting in a court of law as has been adduced in many instances. We were sitting in a committee of the Senate; quasi judicial, quasi political. In the United States, when a jury retreats to go and make a decision on a matter that is before the court, they do so on the basis of two things; law and the understanding ... view
• 15 Aug 2014 in Senate: Mr. Speaker, Sir, be that as it may, we were sitting as eleven people in a House, out of who each one of those eleven people is a respected and able individual to make a decision. We were not sitting in a court of law as has been adduced in many instances. We were sitting in a committee of the Senate; quasi judicial, quasi political. In the United States, when a jury retreats to go and make a decision on a matter that is before the court, they do so on the basis of two things; law and the understanding ... view
• 15 Aug 2014 in Senate: Mr. Speaker, Sir, I really--- view
• 15 Aug 2014 in Senate: Mr. Speaker, Sir, I really--- view
• 15 Aug 2014 in Senate: Mr. Speaker, Sir, finally I just wanted to point out something as I sit down. That because of the nature of the impeachment process which is quasi- judicial, view