All parliamentary appearances
Entries 511 to 520 of 1172.
-
15 Nov 2011 in National Assembly:
I love my country and we are the people!
view
-
15 Nov 2011 in National Assembly:
These amendments, because we are restricting ourselves to the legality of this arguments, I do not want to go to the reasons why they have been brought because the reasons why they have been brought will be canvassed in a separate time. However, the issues that have been canvassed by GI are actually serious matters of constitutional interpretation.
view
-
15 Nov 2011 in National Assembly:
Mr. Temporary Deputy Speaker, Sir, a proposal has been made---
view
-
15 Nov 2011 in National Assembly:
Mr. Temporary Deputy Speaker, Sir, a proposal has been made---
view
-
15 Nov 2011 in National Assembly:
Mr. Temporary Deputy Speaker, Sir, a proposal has been brought---
view
-
15 Nov 2011 in National Assembly:
Mr. Temporary Deputy Speaker, Sir, a proposal has been brought to suggest that if you really want the national participation in any debate of a constitutional amendment, you must come up with a Sessional Paper. The only reason that constitutional amendments take 90 days after they have been proposed is to allow for public participation. Ninety days is long enough for this country to discuss the constitutional amendment. In fact, they have already been discussed very extensively! They have been extensively discussed in---
view
-
15 Nov 2011 in National Assembly:
Thank you, Mr. Temporary Deputy Speaker, Sir. Because I will not get another chance to say what I wanted to say, let me say quickly the following. Public participation does not have to be brought by a Sessional Paper only. Merely because a constitutional amendment requires 90 days, gives the public sufficient time to participate in the proposed amendments.
view
-
15 Nov 2011 in National Assembly:
Lastly to suggest that there are no principles and no usages or customs or procedures that are broken by bringing these amendments--- They may be unpleasant – I may even concede that – they may be unwise; they may be all those things, but this House can entertain the debate and resolution on these amendments. However, for the hon. Members to suggest that we cannot even debate them; for hon. Members to suggest that we cannot even vote on them is to deny this Parliament its rightful role to debate and throw away, or to debate and then act.
view
-
15 Nov 2011 in National Assembly:
I support.
view
-
2 Nov 2011 in National Assembly:
On a point of order, Mr. Speaker, Sir. Just a small matter. Mr. Wamalwa has said that we were not caring how the money was being siphoned. That is a new word that has come out of his speech that has not been properly grounded on any foundation. Could he explain the meaning of the word “siphoning”?
view