10 Dec 2009 in National Assembly:
Mr. Temporary Deputy Chairman, Sir, it is true that under our Constitution, laws cannot be passed retroactively. So, I support this amendment.
view
10 Dec 2009 in National Assembly:
Mr. Temporary Deputy Chairman, Sir, I support that amendment. In fact, I would like to commend the Committee for putting a hold on this clause because what would have happened is that, if for example, you forget to declare what you have and which is not proceeds of crime, it would mean that you would have committed an offence. So, at least, this is corrected so that we protect innocent people who may not concede to this. Mr. Temporary Deputy Chairman, Sir, I was thinking that, once you remove Clause 17(2), then what really is left is more of cleaning ...
view
10 Dec 2009 in National Assembly:
Mr. Temporary Deputy Chairman, Sir, I want to thank the Chairman of the Committee. I am seeing some practical difficulties in this amendment. I have no problem with the intention, but there are some practical difficulties. For example, at what point is it recorded? Because I am seeing a problem where a police or a law enforcement agent is to reveal that a crime may be committed or that somebody committed a crime. According to this, before searching or detaining such persons, he first says: âCan you, please, wait here? I first want to record the reasons why I want ...
view
10 Dec 2009 in National Assembly:
Mr. Temporary Deputy Chairman, Sir, really, at what point do you do the recording? How do you, before you detain or search a person, first of all record the reason? How practical is it? Will that person you want to detain or search stand still as you tell him: âI want to detain youâ or âI want to arrest you and therefore, first of all stand still so that I can look for a piece of paper and a pen so that I can record the reasons
view
10 Dec 2009 in National Assembly:
First of all, Mr. Temporary Deputy Chairman, Sir, I am appealing to the Chairman to see the practical needs of his proposal. If he does not, then, I will oppose it because it is not practical!
view
10 Dec 2009 in National Assembly:
Mr. Temporary Deputy Chairman, Sir, I am opposing because it is not practical!
view
10 Dec 2009 in National Assembly:
Mr. Deputy Speaker, Sir, today is, indeed, a historic occasion. We have been looking at this Bill for a very long time. It has come to the Floor of Parliament once or twice. However, it is to the credit of the Tenth Parliament that we now have an Anti-money Laundering Bill. Yes, it has been diluted a little bit, but I think a bone is better than nothing.
view
10 Dec 2009 in National Assembly:
Thank you, Mr. Deputy Speaker, Sir.
view
10 Dec 2009 in National Assembly:
On a point of order, Mr. Deputy Speaker, Sir.
view
10 Dec 2009 in National Assembly:
Mr. Deputy Speaker, Sir, you realise that this Motion was brought here by Government Minister. When he was moving debate yesterday, he said that the Government wanted this Motion to be passed, so that the other things can begin, so that we can begin decongesting our city. I am surprised that my good friend, Mr. Muriithi, who is an Assistant Minister, is actually opposing a Government Motion that has been approved by the Cabinet. Is he in order?
view