Samuel Kiprono Chepkonga

All parliamentary appearances

Entries 2601 to 2610 of 3315.

• 30 Jul 2014 in National Assembly: “As to whether the presidential elections held on 4th March, 2013 was conducted in a free, fair, transparent and credible manner in compliance with the provisions of the Constitution and all relevant provisions of the law, it is the decision of the court that the said elections were, indeed, conducted in compliance with the Constitution and the law.” view
• 30 Jul 2014 in National Assembly: Hon. Deputy Speaker, we were being invited to sit on appeal of the Supreme Court decision. As you know, Article 163(2)(a) gives exclusive power to the Supreme Court to made a determination--- view
• 30 Jul 2014 in National Assembly: Hon. Deputy Speaker, just for clarity, this is the Constitution of Kenya passed in 2013. It says in Article 162(2):- view
• 30 Jul 2014 in National Assembly: “Parliament shall establish courts with the status of the High Court to hear and determine disputes relating to- (a) view
• 30 Jul 2014 in National Assembly: Employment and labour relations; and---“ When it comes to the Supreme Court, Article 163(3)(a) states:- view
• 30 Jul 2014 in National Assembly: “Exclusive original jurisdiction to hear and determine disputes relating to the elections to the office of the President arising under Article 140 is the preserve of the Supreme Court.” view
• 30 Jul 2014 in National Assembly: The Supreme Court has expressed itself on this matter. It determined the matter that it was invited to determine in Petitions Nos.3, 4 and 5 of 2013. As I have just said, they made their orders accordingly. view
• 30 Jul 2014 in National Assembly: Hon. Deputy Speaker, on the Committee’s findings:- (1) On alleged serious violation of the Constitution and the laws of Kenya, the Committee by majority found that the petition does not specifically set out the functions of the Chairperson and Members of the Commission in which they failed to perform or which Article of the Constitution or any other law they have violated. view
• 30 Jul 2014 in National Assembly: (2) On the alleged gross misconduct, the Committee by majority found that the petitioner did not provide any material evidence to establish and prove gross misconduct against the Chairperson or Members of the Commission. There were no facts that were provided. view
• 30 Jul 2014 in National Assembly: (3) On the alleged mismanagement of public finances contrary to Article 201 of the Constitution as read together with Article 10 of the Constitution, in the procurement of BVRs and EVID the Committee by majority found that the BVRs and EVID are matters of procurement and several officers of the Commission have been charged in court in Nairobi in Anti-Corruption Case No.16 of 2013 as evidenced by the charge sheet The electronic version of the Official Hansard Report is for information purposesonly. A certified version of this Report can be obtained from the Hansard Editor. view