Stephen Kipyego Sang

All parliamentary appearances

Entries 41 to 50 of 2013.

• 2 Mar 2017 in Senate: Let us move to the Statements to be issued. BUSINESS FOR THE WEEK COMMENCING TUESDAY, 28TH MARCH, 2017 view
• 2 Mar 2017 in Senate: What is your point of order, Sen.Wako? view
• 2 Mar 2017 in Senate: I am sure Sen. (Prof.) Lonyagapuo has heard your sentiments. Order No.8 The electronic version of the Senate Hansard Report is for information purposes only. A certified version of this Report can be obtained from the Hansard Editor, Senate view
• 2 Mar 2017 in Senate: Order! You need to move the Motion as you have moved several others in this House before. view
• 2 Mar 2017 in Senate: Rest assured that is still the way to move motions in the National Assembly. view
• 2 Mar 2017 in Senate: Before he does so, I have a communication to make. Hon. Senators, I would like to acknowledge the presence in the Speaker’s Gallery this afternoon of visitors from the Norwegian Council for Children and Youth Organizations. They are:-- (1) Ms. Embla Mathisen; and (2) Ms. Solveig – Marie Haland In our usual tradition of receiving and welcoming visitors to Parliament, I wish to extend a warm welcome to them. On behalf of the Senate, and on my own behalf, I wish them a fruitful visit. I thank you. view
• 2 Mar 2017 in Senate: As requested by Sen. Wangari and as it is our tradition, I wish once more to acknowledge visitors from the Norwegian Council for Children and Youth Organizations. They are:- (1) Ms. Embla Mathisen; and (2) Ms. Solveig – Marie Haland view
• 2 Mar 2017 in Senate: Sen. Wako, proceed to second the Motion. view
• 2 Mar 2017 in Senate: Hon. Senators, I have a communication to make on the Special Sitting of Parliament for the State of the Nation Address by His Excellency the President. The electronic version of the Senate Hansard Report is for information purposes only. A certified version of this Report can be obtained from the Hansard Editor, Senate view
• 2 Mar 2017 in Senate: On a point of order, Madam Temporary Speaker. More particularly, you would remember that when that issue was contested by the same Senator, the Speaker made a ruling. It is unfortunate for the Senator to continue to perpetuate the same position. He raised the matter and it was confirmed that the said two Senators had the authority to vote. Is he, therefore, in order to raise the same issue that was settled by the Speaker, which amounts to actually attempting to counter the position given by the Speaker? view