All parliamentary appearances
Entries 211 to 220 of 1299.
-
23 Aug 2012 in National Assembly:
On a point of order, Mr. Temporary Deputy Chairman, Sir. I have been sitting here wanting to contribute but I have not been seen for the last three hours. Either I am part of this game or not. I could leave. I have been shouting here “point of order” all the time!
view
-
23 Aug 2012 in National Assembly:
On a point of order, Mr. Temporary Deputy Chairman, Sir. I have been sitting here wanting to contribute but I have not been seen for the last three hours. Either I am part of this game or not. I could leave. I have been shouting here “point of order” all the time!
view
-
23 Aug 2012 in National Assembly:
On a point of order, Mr. Temporary Deputy Chairman, Sir. I have been sitting here wanting to contribute but I have not been seen for the last three hours. Either I am part of this game or not. I could leave. I have been shouting here “point of order” all the time!
view
-
23 Aug 2012 in National Assembly:
Mr. Temporary Deputy Chairman, Sir, it is unfortunate that sometimes the way we behave; anyway, I want to say that we are here to make laws that are clear, and not to push laws that have a lot of ambiguity. When you talk about a state office after a fair administrative process, what is the measure of that “fair administrative process”? I stand to strongly support.
view
-
23 Aug 2012 in National Assembly:
Mr. Temporary Deputy Chairman, Sir, it is unfortunate that sometimes the way we behave; anyway, I want to say that we are here to make laws that are clear, and not to push laws that have a lot of ambiguity. When you talk about a state office after a fair administrative process, what is the measure of that “fair administrative process”? I stand to strongly support.
view
-
23 Aug 2012 in National Assembly:
Mr. Temporary Deputy Chairman, Sir, it is unfortunate that sometimes the way we behave; anyway, I want to say that we are here to make laws that are clear, and not to push laws that have a lot of ambiguity. When you talk about a state office after a fair administrative process, what is the measure of that “fair administrative process”? I stand to strongly support.
view
-
23 Aug 2012 in National Assembly:
Mr. Temporary Deputy Chairman, Sir, I would want to move a further amendment to the amendment to Clause 45A (2) (b) by removing it. It is where it says, “the State officer’s spouse”. Our Constitution is such that it gives every person their own rights. When you tell me to declare what my spouse owns, she may as well refuse to tell me what she owns. It is my proposal to further amend that amendment by removing Subclause (2)(b).
view
-
23 Aug 2012 in National Assembly:
Mr. Temporary Deputy Chairman, Sir, I would want to move a further amendment to the amendment to Clause 45A (2) (b) by removing it. It is where it says, “the State officer’s spouse”. Our Constitution is such that it gives every person their own rights. When you tell me to declare what my spouse owns, she may as well refuse to tell me what she owns. It is my proposal to further amend that amendment by removing Subclause (2)(b).
view
-
23 Aug 2012 in National Assembly:
Mr. Temporary Deputy Chairman, Sir, I would want to move a further amendment to the amendment to Clause 45A (2) (b) by removing it. It is where it says, “the State officer’s spouse”. Our Constitution is such that it gives every person their own rights. When you tell me to declare what my spouse owns, she may as well refuse to tell me what she owns. It is my proposal to further amend that amendment by removing Subclause (2)(b).
view
-
23 Aug 2012 in National Assembly:
Mr. Temporary Deputy Chairman, Sir, we have talked about this endlessly. This is a simple matter and it cannot stand anywhere with all the others which have been deleted. In any event, this is against Article 35 of the Constitution which provides for the right to get information and now we are saying that it is secret. We have dealt with this matter. May I ask you to put the question?
view