All parliamentary appearances
Entries 601 to 610 of 1067.
-
3 Dec 2015 in National Assembly:
Hon. Temporary Deputy Chairman, I beg to move:- THAT, Clause 62 of the Bill be deleted.
view
-
3 Dec 2015 in National Assembly:
Hon. Temporary Deputy Chairman, we looked at that deletion very keenly as a Committee and we realised that the environmental issues are well taken care of by the Environment Management and Coordination Act. Therefore, it was not necessary to introduce this particular aspect of it within this Act again. For example, when you want to do development today, you wait for the NEMA report. Before you are given permission by the county to do any development, it will be very hard because NEMA will even take longer time. Therefore, it is better you get permission from the county first and ...
view
-
3 Dec 2015 in National Assembly:
Hon. Temporary Deputy Chairman, I beg to move:- THAT, Clause 63 of the Bill be amended− (a) by deleting sub-clause (1) and substituting therefor the following new sub-clause− “(1) A planning authority shall maintain a register of documents submitted by applicants for development permission and shall issue a submission certificate to every applicant who submits such documents”; and (b) by deleting sub-clause (2).
view
-
3 Dec 2015 in National Assembly:
Hon. Temporary Deputy Chairman, I beg to move:- THAT, clause 64 of the Bill be amended− The electronic version of the Official Hansard Report is for information purposesonly. A certified version of this Report can be obtained from the Hansard Editor.
view
-
3 Dec 2015 in National Assembly:
(a) by deleting sub-clause (1) and substituting therefor the following new sub- clause− “(1) A planning authority may levy a development fee against an applicant for development permission.”; and (b) by deleting sub-clause (3).
view
-
3 Dec 2015 in National Assembly:
Hon. Temporary Deputy Chairman, I beg to move:- THAT, clause 65 of the Bill be amended in sub-clause (3) by inserting the word “further” immediately after the words “it may impose”.
view
-
3 Dec 2015 in National Assembly:
Hon. Temporary Deputy Chairman, I beg to move:- THAT, clause 66 of the Bill be amended by deleting sub-clause (1).
view
-
3 Dec 2015 in National Assembly:
Hon. Temporary Deputy Chairman, what we are considering is sometimes the ability of the developer. Physical planning must take consideration of what is supposed to take place even tomorrow. If you are given permission to put up a building next to an airport and you are told, for example, that you cannot put up more than two stories, the planning has been done in relation to that particular airport. Therefore, we cannot afford to limit the particular person because of the inability of the authority to plan well for a particular county or town.
view
-
3 Dec 2015 in National Assembly:
Your explanation makes sense, Hon. Temporary Deputy Chairman.
view
-
3 Dec 2015 in National Assembly:
Hon. Temporary Deputy Chairman, indeed, as you said, if sub- clause (1) goes, sub-clause (2) must also go. There will be no need of penalising a particular person if the period of time is infinity. However, although I agree on this one, it is important to note that sometimes we give leeway for urban authorities not to plan well. For example, we know about the railway lines. We know that they were done during the colonial time. Therefore, it is necessary for our authorities to manage our planning in a sense that they can take even 200 years.
view