27 Nov 2013 in National Assembly:
assume that nothing has been done and yet, that problem still persists and it is very serious.
view
27 Nov 2013 in National Assembly:
I thought I would get a response this morning because I was given two weeks but no response was given. I would like to get an assurance that the response will be given tomorrow, given the grave nature of this matter.
view
27 Nov 2013 in National Assembly:
Thank you, hon. Speaker. I had indicated that the structure of command in the police needs to be streamlined according to the amendments proposed. There has consistently been an insistence that the Commission should be in charge of administrative functions such as simple transfers and even giving commands. This, in my view, has resulted in the police force not performing its duties properly.
view
27 Nov 2013 in National Assembly:
We have instances like I earlier mentioned about Laikipia, where the police force is not able to respond adequately and speedily to situations on the ground, my view is that this comes from a disorganized command structure. This may be removed if certain functions of command are made the sole preserve of the Inspector General of Police. I had earlier on said that constitutional commissions such as Teachers Service Commission (TSC) in their structure leave the day to day running of their affairs to the Chief Secretary of TSC; similarly, the day to day running of the police force can ...
view
27 Nov 2013 in National Assembly:
(CEO). Equally, for those who come from the corporate world, they will agree with me that even companies do not have the day to day running under the board of directors. If they have to give promotions at certain levels, this does not have to involve the board of directors. If they also have to do transfers on a day to day basis, it is not the whole board that comes down to do this. I agree with the Mover of this amendment Bill, that some of the functions of the police force can be under the Inspector General and ...
view
27 Nov 2013 in National Assembly:
Hon. Speaker Sir, on the admission of my friend and colleague that he had spoken on this issue before, is it not against the Standing Order for him to be allowed to speak on the same issue the second time?
view
27 Nov 2013 in National Assembly:
It is on his own admission.
view
27 Nov 2013 in National Assembly:
Thank you, hon. Speaker. I am in full agreement with what you have said. I would suggest that since this particular Bill has been prosecuted fairly enough, we allow contribution by only a few Members and conclude debate on it. You could give a chance to two Members to contribute and then we conclude debate on the Bill. We can even reduce the number of minutes entitled to speakers. We can then move on to the next Bill.
view
27 Nov 2013 in National Assembly:
Thank you hon. Temporary Deputy Speaker, Sir. As the Mover of this particular Bill said, the majority of the amendments involved are minor. There may be those that are substantive to some hon. Members and, indeed, some that we might need to adjust. But we might need to tidy up. I would appreciate if I would be given my moment. You will have your moment. This Bill is before this House procedurally.
view
27 Nov 2013 in National Assembly:
This Bill is before the House procedurally.
view